Stanislavsky’s AN ACTOR PREPARES
Adapted by Mickle Maher
University of Chicago Theatre and Performance Studies
Program
Theatre East, Logan Center for the Arts
Directed by Devon de Mayo
Scenic AND Lighting Design by Yours Truly
Costume Design by Nathan Rohr
Sound Design/Composition by Rob Milburn and Michael Bodeen
THE STORY
Constantin Stanislavsky was a great acting instructor in
Moscow in the early days of the 20th century, made famous for
creating a system of acting that brought about a revolution of a more
naturalistic style. This was manifested in his great book, AN ACTOR PREPARES,
which virtually every actor reads at some point in his/her training. His
personal life was fraught with trying to stay on the ‘good side’ of Stalin and
the rise of Communism in his homeland.
Our play is, in essence an adaptation of the book, which
takes the form of a journal of a young actor beginning his formal training. All
of the characters have aspects of Stanislavsky’s personality in them, making it
somewhat strangely autobiographical.
In it, the young student KOSTYA begins exploring the
different aspects of how to “live through a role” the central conceit of
Stanislavsky’s “System”. At the beginning of the play, Stanislavsky talks to
the audience, about how he wants to present each chapter to them, but is
interrupted by another actor dressed identically, who identifies himself as
Stanislavsky… These two are joining by a third, fourth, all the way up to eight
OUR PRODUCTION
Not sure how to begin writing about this one… it’s special
on many fronts.
Firstly it is the inaugural production in the brand spankin’
new Reva and David Logan Center for the Arts here at University of Chicago. So… we moved into the building a mere 4
weeks before we went into tech, and were constantly challenged by the fact the
contractors were (and even now AFTER the show) continuing the work to finish
the building and the full functionality of all its’ spaces. In the coming
couple of weeks I’ll write a post about the building itself, as its’
fascinating on many levels and having been party to the creative process that
birthed the building itself, I have a soft spot for this place now. I think I
always will, but more on that later, back to the show….
Secondly, this was the first piece that was truly
commissioned by the academic program here. And the process was LONG and
fascinating. Mickle Maher, the writer/adapter is known about Chicago for his
challenging, erudite, quirky and endlessly inventive creative works… whether
juxtaposing Camus’ The Stranger with the Bush/Kerry debates from ’04 in THE
STRANGERER, to the bizarre and fascinating opera HUNCHBACK VARIATIONS in which
Beethoven and Hugo’s Hunchback try to create a sound effect for Chekov’s CHERRY
ORCHARD… You can’t argue with the power of intellect here. You CAN argue with the fact that the
design process had to take a backseat to a text that was undergoing radical
revisions up until first rehearsal. And even beyond. So… you do it… try
designing set and lights for a show that is in flux, in a building and space
that’s also in flux as to its’ availability, and it’s physical preparedness for
a show. Let’s just say I have a few new gray hairs following this project….
Having said that, I’m really quite proud with how it turned out. The actors
were STUNNING, , the arc of Stanislavski’s journey of continuous re-self-discovery
(literally) became truly alive onstage, in a way that was hard to comprehend on
the page. I have to give huge kudos to Rob Milburn and Michael Bodeen, the
composers/sound designers on the show, as well as the director, Devon, for
sculpting the play with sound, and underscoring, in a way that I didn’t think
was truly possible. Exacting selections of Shostakovich and newly composed
pieces dovetailed with the emotional journey of facing the horrors of Communism
on the psyche of a consummate artist of the human.
Marya's apartment
the arrival of Stanislavski-5, aka Meyerhold
The killing of Stan's nephew, Mika (Stanislavski-6)
As to my contribution… I took on two separate areas this
time around, and I’m both glad that I did, and more-than-mildly exhausted from
the effort. The set consisted of a series of draperies in the spirit of an old
slightly-unused theatre (the play is nominally set in the theatre that Stan
erected in his residence, called Onegin Hall. It’s where he taught students,
rehearsed and performed many great works), these curtains tabbed up, slid on
slider tracks, and generally whizzed around the space to sculpt the individual
moments of the play. Upstage was a set of old-forgotten-looking theatrical
walls (called ‘flats’ in the biz), scattered about, that without moving, were
transformed by light and usage into the many nominal locations that Stan’s mind
moved to in process of embodying the story of Kostya and his mates and their
teacher Tortsov.
As a scenic designer, I’m so very used, in tech, to be
sitting there… paying attention, ready to help, but generally sitting on my
@ss, as I can’t actually DO much during tech aside from take notes on things
that need to be altered, painted, reworked in some way…. It’s one of the
reasons I started this blog… I’m often bored to near tears during tech, because
there isn’t much for a scenic designer to do aside from be supportive….and surf
the web.
BUT THIS TIME… I was the one trying to figure out what
lights were where, and trying to decide in the moment, how to sculpt the visual
space with light to help support the tone of the differing moments in the
story. I had to be ON, for two straight days during tech, and I have to say, I
found myself a little lacking. Those mental muscles are enough out of shape
that I really ought to reengage with lighting or sound in the future, and flex
them. I created a set of “basic looks”, a warm inviting world whenever we were in the
classroom, something bluer/colder for whenever MEYERHOLD came into the
storytelling frame, to augment the sense of doom that really followed Meyerhold
during Stanislavskis’ writing of
AN ACTOR PREPARES.
Beyond that, I worked some lighting textures (called gobos)
into the lighting palette, in order to soften the harsh lines of all the
vertical curtains that dominated the set. And the upstage I used a couple
Constructivist-style gobos to stand in for Stalin and the politics of the world
(Constructivism being a visual art movement popularized in the 1910s/1920s in
Russia that used lots of geometric shapes to create robot-esque worlds that
pointed to man’s futility in a machine-like society. This movement softened
somewhat (or was co-opted) into the more fluid Art Deco Movement of the
following years.
note the thread-like patterns at the bottom, and the red abstract shapes behind them.
But my favorite gobo-set was a series of silky languorous
clouds (that we colored yellow) that streaked diagonally across the upstage
flats. I LOVED the shadows that they created, especially when the muslin walls
were backlit so that you could see the STRUCTURE of the theatrical flats.
Ultimately I didn’t’ get to use them as much as I would have liked, but they
gave an eerie and unsettling tone to the scene near the end where Stanislavski
is forced to accept (and view, if only in his head) Meyerhold’s execution.
Ultimately, I have to admit that I was pleased with how the
show visually turned out, and even with my own misgivings about my abilities as
a lighting designer, I feel confident in saying that I supported the story, and
that it looked pretty damned nice… if I do say so myself…. But now… I need some
rest….
Meyerhold's Execution
No comments:
Post a Comment